Box clever: Singapore's magic formula for maths success

Box clever: Singapore's magic formula for maths success

July 2, 2009 - It sounds crazy but Singapore has shot up the league tables by dropping traditional methods from its maths lessons and getting children to be creative. By Liz Lightfoot

Children from Northwood Prep school get to grips with Singapore Maths

Will Wintercross

Children from Northwood Prep school get to grips with Singapore Maths

One country teaches children to recite their times tables and drills them in mental arithmetic. The other bans rote learning and encourages pupils to manipulate real objects and share ideas as they work in groups. Which one is Singapore, which consistently comes first or second in the international league tables for mathematics, and which is England? The answer may come as a surprise. For despite the reputation of Pacific Rim countries for traditional chalk and talk, it is Singapore that uses the so-called trendy modern methods whereby children learn by doing in noisy classrooms. Times tables are frowned upon, just as they once were in England before the advent of the national curriculum.

Singaporean classrooms are noisy places where children learn maths by folding paper, constructing models and re-arranging pieces of fruit or lollipop sticks. And it is this method devised by the ministry of education that the city-state says has led to its rapid rise up the international tables.

In the last Timms survey of maths and science standards in 49 countries, Singapore came first for science and second for maths. Since the scheme known as Singapore Maths was introduced in the 1990s, the nation has not only moved to the top but no longer has a tail of low achievers. It was also ranked first for the quality of its education system by the Global Competitiveness Report 2007–2008.

As Singapore moved away from traditional methods to Western-style creativity and discovery learning, England moved in the opposite direction, bringing back compulsory times tables and tests for mental arithmetic. England, too, has improved its standing from 25th place in 1995 to seventh in the 2008 Timms survey published last December, but still more than one-fifth of children fail to pass the national curriculum maths tests. Last year, only 78 per cent of 11-year-olds and 77 per cent of 14-year-olds reached the standard expected for their age.

Now the Singapore system is being brought to Britain by the publisher Marshall Cavendish and Maths – No Problem, an organisation promoting good materials for home and school. But is it the method which makes the difference, or are children in Singapore more diligent and better supported at home?

Ling Yuan, head of maths at the Catholic High School in Singapore, was in Britain last week conducting seminars for home educators and maths teachers and visiting schools. She says the content of what is taught in primary maths differs very little to what is in the national curriculum in England, except that children in this country are expected to learn some areas of geometry that are taught to secondary-age children in Singapore.

There is more emphasis in Singapore maths, however, on gaining a good understanding of the basics before moving on, she says. This provides a strong foundation. Key to the programme is the insistence that children learn by sequence, first by manipulating objects in the real world, then by drawing pictorial representations before using the mathematical symbols.

"The concrete, pictorial, abstract method is very powerful because it helps children to visualise number and proportion. There is a huge emphasis on problem solving," she told a seminar in London. "The children form a mental picture and a deeper understanding using beans or pieces of pasta and then they might draw a box with green beans in it and for every 10 green beans you get a red one."

The simple task of folding paper can help children visualise division, she said, adding: "We don't get our children to memorise times tables. We are not into rote learning. We get the children to calculate 12 times six by breaking it into two times six and 10 times six and they soon get the answer into their brains."

Children in Singapore start school later, at the age of seven, and classes are larger – about 40 pupils. Whereas many maths classes are set by ability in England, Singaporean primary schools have mixed ability classes and rely on scaffolded questions to provide more challenging work for the most able. There is also an emphasis on children learning from each other.

"You would be shocked if you walked into one of our classrooms. Where is the teacher? He or she will not be at the front but working with one of the groups and there will be a lot of noise, we encourage children to work out the problems together," explains Ling. "Sometimes parents come to us worried because their children say they have been playing in maths, but when they see the mid-year test scores, they are satisfied."

Teachers are provided with examples of practical exercises and ways of illustrating mathematical concepts through pictures, using rectangles divided into parts or with blocks in which the children draw different numbers of objects. This helps primary teachers in Singapore who, like those in England, teach across the curriculum and are not usually maths specialists, adds Ling. The system has already been adopted at schools serving disadvantaged pupils in parts of America and a study by the US Department of Education found they had made very significant progress. "Singaporean students are more successful in mathematics than their US counterparts because Singapore has a world-class mathematics system with quality components aligned to produce students who learn mathematics to mastery," the researchers concluded. Some UK schools are adopting the scheme, among them Northwood Preparatory School in Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire. Bernie Westacott, its head of maths, says pupils were already doing well but after just a year of Singapore Maths are a year ahead of where they would have been.

"I have been teaching since 1973 and have never been happy with UK textbooks nor the way we have taught maths," he says. "I have continually searched for something that would be closer to what I felt was a better way so that this could be given to teachers as a ready-made resource, along with a reasonable amount of training. A few years ago I came across Singapore Maths which seemed a perfect fit.

"Pupils focus intensely on a handful of 'real maths' topics, whereas in the UK the maths curriculum is a mile wide and an inch deep, making it difficult for students to master the most important skills. Rather than teaching pupils to memorise facts and routines, the focus is on maths concepts which are born out of practical experience. We have seen a large improvement in their problem-solving ability because they are manipulating objects as opposed to learning routines."

Stephan Cook, the head of St Faith's CofE school in Wandsworth, south-west London, says aspects of the Singapore method are already in place in Britain, but less systematically. he says: "The books for teachers giving examples of how maths problems can be portrayed pictorially would be useful, but the most important thing in any method is that the teacher understands the concepts before trying to pass them on."

New versions of the Primary Mathematics and My Pals Are Here series of textbooks, published by Marshall Cavendish under curriculum guidelines from the Singapore Ministry of Education, will be available in Britain later this month

www.marshallcavendish.com/education 

www.mathsnoproblem.co.uk


Comments (6)

Said this on 2-7-09 At 06:44 am

"It sounds crazy but Singapore has shot up the league tables by dropping traditional methods from its maths lessons and getting children to be creative."

This premise is not proven in any way, shape, or form. The analysis is misleading and shallow. It's not the creativity.

"As Singapore moved away from traditional methods to Western-style creativity and discovery learning,...

Well, then what's the big screw-up in the US? Let's just blame the kids, parents, and society.

"England moved in the opposite direction, bringing back compulsory times tables and tests for mental arithmetic."

Yup, those Singapore kids got to the top without hard work and practice; without knowing what 6*7 is in fifth grade. Maybe it's genetics. Maybe it's society. Maybe educators should look in the mirror.

"There is more emphasis in Singapore maths, however, on gaining a good understanding of the basics before moving on, ..."

Hard work and mastery. What do we get in the US? Everyday Math which says that you can "trust the spiral". US educators will look at this article and see only what they want to see.

 "Singaporean students are more successful in mathematics than their US counterparts because Singapore has a world-class mathematics system with quality components aligned to produce students who learn mathematics to mastery,"

Imagine. Grade-by-grade mastery, not developmentally appropriate mumbo-jumbo that says that kids will learn eventually if you spiral through the material enough times. If they don't, then it's their own fault. Good ol' natural learning. How convenient that it removes all responsibility from the school.

The problem is that even if schools in the US start to use Singapore Math (which I would love), they will screw it up unless they enforce grade-by-grade mastery. Creativity won't do the job, mastery will. Balance won't do the job either. Ensuring grade-by-grade mastery will. The onus is on the school, not the students. But what do we get in the US? Trust the spiral and blame the students. If you wait long enough, all problems look like they are the fault of the student, parent, or society. With a little luck, even the student will say that they are just not good in math.

Said this on 2-7-09 At 10:16 am

"It sounds crazy" because it is.  the article is so misleading that it is not worth correcting.  The Singapore texts are excellent and worth following if done with care to learn each thing thoroughly before going on.  They look simpler than thay are.  The article gives a picture of math teaching the way the current orthodoxy claims is good, but the success of Singapore itself is not based on the kind of classroom being described in the article.

Dan Dempsey
Said this on 2-7-09 At 07:37 pm

As the owner of many Singapore math books from grade 1 through grade 10  in several editions I find this article completely inaccurate.

The article is shockingly misleading.  The principle characteristics of reform math in the USA are the large amounts of dollars and time spent on professional development, professional learning communities, and coaching, with no accountability.  This produces incredibly poor results.  A quality curriculum does not require this nonsense  .... but the US Plan is to have No Vendor Left Behind.

Social promotion based on the unending spiral with little mastery expected at any level is not a characteristic of Singpore math.

Author fails to mention the real math exam at the end of grade 6 and the O level exam near the end of grade 10.  Singapore requires the students to actually know the mathematics not just have heard about math in math appreciation class.

<a href="Http://www.mathunderground.blogspot.com"> The Math Underground </a>

yvonne meyer
Said this on 2-7-09 At 05:45 pm

This story is an advertorial for the Marshall Cavandish textbooks being marketed in the UK which is fine but should not be read as an endorsement of current shoddy maths teaching & learning programmes in the UK, USA and Australia.

The main reasons that Singapore students achieve well academically is that instruction is teacher-directed and not child centred.

Young teachers coming into the profession have higher personal levels of literacy & numeracy than many in Western countries because they have not been subjected to the fads like Whole Language & Fuzzy Maths that dominate the Education System in the UK, USA & Australia.

Singapore students are 'streamed' according to ability. Also, to graduate from Primary (Elementary) School, they must take an exam and if the fail, they repeat the year. If they fail a second time, they are out of the school system. 

Secondary (High) School is 4 years and is 'streamed' into academic and non-academic paths. Only those students in the academic path, who pass the exams and intend going to University, are accepted into Pre-U (Years 11 & 12).

I started school in Singapore aged 5 (many years ago) when discipline was enforced from the the first day with a smack to the back of the head and a sign around the child's neck that said, "I am stupid". Singapore Educators have relaxed a bit since then and added some 'icing on the cake' activities to classroom learning but after-school tutoring has also increased expedentially.

 

SamP
Said this on 2-7-09 At 06:22 pm

Odd...which Singapore are they talking about? I live in Singapore and I've never seen kids doing that. I know some special ed classes use similar methods, but...

Said this on 6-7-09 At 12:18 pm

I own the entire Primary Mathematics series: K-6.

The texts provide explicit, sequenced instruction for all concepts, and there is no mention of manipulatives. 

You can look at sample pages from all the books at the Singapore Math web site.

Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: