Open Letter from John Dewey to the Principal of Langley High School, McLean, Virginia

For those who do not know me, I am a parent and deeply concerned with the poor state of education in the U.S.I write under the name of John Dewey in order to prevent retribution for what I say about the things I see wrong.

The Langley High School in McLean, Virginia is –according to the Newsweek ranking of U.S. high schools—number 55 in the country, and the highest ranked of high schools in Fairfax County, Virginia.A new principal, Matthew Ragone, just took over this fall, and as part of his introduction to the parents of Langley students, he wrote a piece in the PTSA newsletter.My wife and I read what he wrote on separate occasions, and later we both talked about two paragraphs in the piece that we found disturbing.He was talking about issues that the department chairs are working on:

"One topic of discussion has been the concept of the 'Middle Child'.  The 'Middle Child" is the type of student who does not feel at home at Langley because, while they may be smart and academically focused, they are not academically superior like many of their peers.  Nor are they outstanding in extracurricular activities.  This student does not enjoy the prospect of coming to school to face the intense competition, which is ubiquitous in excellent schools, only to be disappointed.

"There is no simple answer to this problem.  In my id eal world every student will walk through the front door on September 2 with an exuberant, positive attitude and feel comfortable and be happy throughout the entire year.  Of course that does not happen.  As we start the school year, the Instructional Council will open dialogue with the general faculty and I will talk with parents at PTSA meetings and parent cofees to solicit your input and ideas.  As the discussion continues with all the stakeholders, I am confident we will find a way to serve the 'Middle Child'."

Reading this, I was reminded of my first year in high school when my high school counselor addressed her new charges by telling us that we were going to be shocked out of our minds come first card-marking when we saw the D's and F's on our report cards.I admit to being shocked first card-marking, when I received 3 A's and a B.Luckily for all of us, this loud-mouthed idiot was not a teacher nor an administrator.The rest of the school was quite good and I was fortunate to have had teachers who really worked to make sure their students learned, and an administration that supported their efforts.In the case of the new principal, he is the new principal. The man in charge, the one who sets the tone.And his message is rather clear.One can read "middle child" as someone in the broad expanse of the bell curve representing the middle.Those familiar with bell curves know that this middle is encompasses a rather large area.Langley follows a pattern of high schools in the US which cater to the elite; i.e., the right hand tail of the bell curve.They let the minority top performers define their school, and for all the others it's sink or swim.Translating his message in even blunter language, he is saying "You kid is going to be miserable at Langley."He tries to soften this message by saying "I'm not sure what to do about it but we're discussing it."Oh gee, I feel better already.

I showed his message to the chair of a math department at a high school in Iowa.Her reaction was as follows:

"I absolutely abhor such generalizations as that given in your note about the middle child!  To me, that is no different than generalizing by race, gender, etc.  I am appalled that this was coming from a PSTA newsletter, and I would complain big time.  As a department chair, there is no way I would ever agree to even discuss such a ridiculous topic, because I have far more important topics to worry about regarding student achievement!Our school has many high achieving students, but there is no way I would ever try to communicate to anyone that his/her child won't cut it in this environment or even that (s)he would struggle.  I prefer to communicate on the positive side, and lay out expectations rather than negatives, and also indicate a supportive tone, not a belittling tone."

To that end, here is some advice to Mr. Ragone if in fact he is looking for any, or even condescending to be.Your message should be"There are no middle children here.Every child matters; every child is as important as the next." And you should mean it.You should provide a culture in which students who aren't getting the material are identified and the school works with them after school or in special sessions to make sure they understand.Students should be encouraged to try out for sports.And really, Mr. Ragone, stop requiring try-outs and three weeks of practice in August when most rational families are trying to get away for a vacation.

My experience tells me that Mr. Ragone is not going to be persuaded to change one thing about Langley except perhaps to make things even more competitive, reduce the number of top performers, and make the middle of the bell curve even larger.Isn't that the name of the game in the "winner takes all" environment that passes for high quality education these days?

From the bottom of my heart, and the middle of the bell curve, I remain

Faithfully yours,

John Dewey

John Dewey is a pseudonym for a concerned parent who, like many parents, knows the difference between good and bad educational practices when he sees it.  And like many parents, he is protective of his child of potential retribution for speaking out against bad practices, and thus chooses to write under a pseudonym.

Published September 11, 2008


Comments (6)

Niki Hayes
Said this on 9-11-2008 At 06:56 pm
My experience tells me that Mr. Ragone is not going to be persuaded to change one thing about Langley except perhaps to make things even more competitive, reduce the number of top performers...

To me, this is the heart of Mr. Ragone's program. It goes along with the many efforts across our nation to do away with programs for high performing students (gifted, if you please). This is supposed to allow the process of osmosis to be experienced by all those not in the gifted programs so they can somehow glean from the brightness of the gifted students.

Don't get me wrong. I believe in heterogenous classes according to the subject matter and the learning levels that truly allow all kids in the room to achieve success at their own levels. But I also believe in true gifted programs as well as special ed programs for lower performing students. Seems to me that's "individualized instruction."

Progressives like to say that "being fair is not the same as being equal" in a classroom situation. In other words, all kids cannot be treated equally, but they can be treated fairly according to their needs. Most competent teachers would agree with this theory and practice. Yet, progressives, whose mantra is egaliatarianism, also have the practice that no one should be treated as "above" anyone else in the classroom. They have, therefore, chosen academic equity over excellence for their students. (This is not true in school sports, however.)

The idiocy of such statements and practices as Mr. Ragone's is that we know most of our economic growth and success is due to the "middle" student who usually has tremendous emotional intelligence and is well-rounded in most ways, compared to those on either end of the Bell Curve. Notice I said "usually" and "in most ways." Mr. Ragone generalizes, so I figure I can also.

You've got an administrator who resents the "upper level" kids and their parents. You've got a snob in his own righteousness who wants to bring those uppity folks down a peg or two. It's going to be an interesting year.
Scrooge McDuck (fake name)
Said this on 9-15-2008 At 06:42 pm
I don't understand why a pseudonym is needed for the author a loose bag of plattitudes like this article. Competitive students are competing FOT something; for admission and scholarship money at elite schools. This is an elitism that nearly all parents have bought into, and it's an elitism forced on the schools by the AP exam system. You can whine all you want about the new principal and his failure to feel your pain with just the right language, but he has no more control over the elitism that matters than you have.

If you want to escape the AP system, there are some hippie alternative schools, and there's Phillips Exeter, which is so elite that it doesn't bother with AP classes or exams because it doesn't have to.

What the New Principal was trying to tell you is he's not happy running what feels like a psych experiment in stress pathology. It's true that some kids eat u the competition and the classes, while mechanical, aren't all that hard. There's no soul to it though, and it's an endless grind. If you want to whine about something, whine about that.
John Dewey
Said this on 9-18-2008 At 07:22 pm
Nicely said, Mr. McDuck. Perhaps you'd like to add your comment as well to Joanne Jacob's coverage of the open letter as well, if you feel that your whining--excuse me--justifiable anger still needs more venting. You will feel in good company among some of the commenters, and can run amuck to your heart's delight amongst the others. It can be found at:
http://joannejacobs.com/2008/09/14/warning-your-av...
jane doe
Said this on 9-20-2008 At 01:42 pm
<I>I don't understand why a pseudonym is needed for the author a loose bag of plattitudes like this article. </I>

A pseudonym is needed because of the distinct possibility that school personnel will retaliate against john dewey's children.
amy bruce
Said this on 9-23-2008 At 08:21 am
I think the demographics in this area consists of most of the bullies and brats we may have grown up with wherever we may be from...they all moved here,,,to the most competitive area in the country!And their children are just like them...or worse!
John Dewey
Said this on 11-12-2008 At 03:32 pm
"If you want to escape the AP system, there are some hippie alternative schools,..."

Further to Mr. McDuck's violent rebuke. The model for the "loose platitudes" (which I am assuming are: "There are no middle children here.Every child matters; every child is as important as the next") is not based on hippy schools or philosophy but a rather rigorous Catholic school in New York. There is an admission exam, and students who go there range from stellar to slightly above average. Competition is stiff and the stakes are high. Yet, the culture is such that students are motivated to do well because the expectation is there. The Langley principal's message was a red flag for the opposite direction.
Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: