Quick Search
Advertise Here?
The Dumbing-Down of America
- 8-7-09
The Dumbing-Down of America
Peter Stern - July 8, 2009
Guest Columnist EducationNews.org
Â
The Endless Loop of Public Education: "Is Our Children Learning?"
Â
The Endless Loop of Public Education: "Is Our Children Learning?"
Â
The Endless Loop of Public Education: "Is Our Children Learning?"
Â
The Endless Loop of Public Education: "Is Our Children Learning?"
Â
The Endless Loop of Public Education: "Is Our Children Learning?"
Â
Â
What we don't want vs. what we need
Â
Â
In the U.S. our children remain on the back-burners for improving learning outcomes and developing successful lives. Most states remain "stuck" in their respective approaches to public education, much as the spinning wheels of a vehicle caught without any traction in 2 feet of mud after a rain storm.
Â
Politics all too often corrupts public education.
Â
In Texas, Gov. Rick Perry recently appointed Cynthia Dunbar to head the State Board of Education (SBOE). Ms. Dunbar is not exactly known for her for her intelligent and open-minded approach to educating Texas children. A significant point: she is one of "those" focused on wanting public schools to teach the Bible and NOT to teach evolution. Enough said.
Â
If that is insufficient to "curl your toes", Texas State Education Commissioner Robert Scott has decided that all high school students will take more electives and fewer required courses under a bill that lawmakers recently approved in May.  Fortunately, the required courses he refers to are computer technology, health and physical education;  we are NOT speaking about required math or science.
Â
Students will no longer be required to take two semesters of computer technology and a semester of health education, while the physical education requirement has been reduced from three semesters to two. Instead, students will consider taking 6 credits of electives. Supposedly, the reason for this is to enable students to select topics that will aid them in develop skills for entering college. Will it work? Who knows.
Â
The ongoing changes in public education occur not only in Texas, but virtually in every state in the nation. What truly is amazing is that every few years schools are forced via legislative agendas to adapt to another "enlightened" approach to teaching education.
Â
Generally, these changes don't amount "to a hill of beans" and it is the educational core requirements that children need to aid their learning outcomes. Too many children still don't learn the basics well. Many do not read at an appropriate level, know how to spell or how to perform simple mathematics. Many don't know basic living skills either, e.g., how to keep a check book and pay bills, or how to write a simple letter or a job resume. All too often our children do not have significant communication and personal skills.
Â
What we need to do is to teach our children the basics of how to succeed in life and in business. Reading, writing and arithmetic still are the key to learning and teaching our children to enjoy learning is not a priority.  So, are we really helping our children to improve their learning outcomes? Not really.
Â
Here in Texas, as in other states, we continue to teach our children to pass certain exams (TAKS) as a guide to and validation of their success. Is it working? Hardly. There is a lot of pressure placed on our children, without increasing their learning outcomes.
Â
Most public education programs provide scattered curriculum and inappropriate teaching methods that on the timeline of pedagogical and learning skills remain on par with the enlightenment level of the Spanish Inquisition. Most children are not well-prepared for college, business or life; consequently, most of them fall through the cracks of the imagined success mold.
Â
Mark Twain is credited with stating, "I never let my schooling interfere with my education."Â How many American children are able to say the same?
Â
How long will it take for lawmakers, educators, and parents to recognize that to improve learning outcomes we must reduce class sizes, promote a love of learning, and teach children that learning is the key to being successful in education, business and life? Otherwise, we merely are passing along our children through the public education system much as in the manufacturing sector where various products move through an assembly line. Mark Twain might have stated that "Products don't get to think much going through the assembly line."
Â
So, if we want to help our children become successful in education, business and life we must provide several basics:
Â
- Encourage children to love learning about all topics
- Teach more of the basics --- reading, writing, mathematics
- Develop communication, business and life training skills
- Reduce class sizes to promote real learning
- While it's nice to provide more electives as options, they are not needed to improve learning skills
- Make classes more interesting by using various methods of learning, e.g., visuals, audio, kinesthetic applications
- Eliminate state exams or don't make them the major measure of success
- Reduce competition among children while promoting group inclusion and real learning
- Evaluate children in a more holistic manner that includes long-term teacher assessment, tests, various learning skills, overall learning outcomes
- Trim the cost of providing public education so that it is more affordable to taxpayers.
In conclusion, it is unfortunate that on the learning evolutionary timeline public educations has remained in the Dark Ages. It is time we reach the Age of Educational Enlightenment by promoting an ongoing love of learning, strengthening the basic core of learning (reading, writing, mathematics), reducing oversized classes and providing curriculum and teaching methods that will improve overall educational skills and learning outcomes of all children.
Â
Â
---
Peter Stern of Driftwood, Texas, <pstern@austin.rr.com>, a former director of information services, university professor and public school administrator, is a political writer well-known and published frequently throughout the Texas community and nationwide. He is a Disabled Vietnam Veteran and holds three post-graduate degrees.
Editor's Choice
Sign up for our Free Daily Email Newsletter
> Haberman Foundation/National Louis University Masters Degree - Who will benefit when classroom teachers take this Action Research and Assessment masters degree?
> Healthcare Education Information 
> Learn a foreign language
> All You Need To Know About Visa to Learn French France
> Online College Degree - Information and tips on online degrees
> do-it-all-janitorialservices.com
> Haberman Foundation and Harvard Graduate School of Education complete a Collaborative Effort
> CampusExplorer.com Search for colleges
> NACAC.net National Association for Admissions Counseling
> Students.gov Link resources for students
> Review and compare the best trade schools in your area.

Removing even more academic competition in the schools will ensure that dumbing down continues...Will Fitzhugh
I spent 33 years in a Texas classroom. I can tell you that there is a lot of money in education - it just doesn't get to the classrooms. The district I retired from is cutting teachers, increasing class sizes. That will pay for the increased number of administrators at the Ad Building.
I think it funny that the current topic du jour is how fat our kids are and yet the number of credits in physical ed has been reduced to 2 in favor of more electives.
I think Texas could save a lot money if they went to half days. Teach only reading/LA, math, science, and history. No free lunch, no Teen Leadership - the feel good course, and other garbage that is forced down kids' throats. If kids want to learn Spanish - just go to an emergency room and hang out. If kids have a musical talent, their parents should invest in lessons. There are hundreds of local city teams - soccer, tennis, baseball, softball, football - for kids to join and get plenty of exercise and learn teamwork.Â
Study is hard work, something other countries may understand but not the typical American student. If it isn't easy, they won't do it. Struggle won't kill anyone. American students don't know how to struggle. So what the state does is make it even easier to get out of school. More goof-off courses just to keep them in school.
Mr. Stern makes several very valid points and I agree that more emphasis should be made on math and science. However, as the mother of a soon to be senior ranking in the top ten of her class of 500, I have no problem with eliminating health, computers and physical education. Most students are very savvy when it comes to computers and have already had several semesters of computer before they reach high school. Health classes are a joke and my daughter gets plenty of exercise with the marching band.
What I don't see Mr. Stern addressing is the inability of the system to rid itself of incompetent and non performing teachers. Nothing of significance in the system rewards excellence and most teachers seem to be deathly afraid of a system that runs on merit even if they are part of the process to establish the criteria for such a review. We can talk about all the rest of it, but when all is said and done, it turns on the ability of the teacher. The teacher can teach in a classroom without windows, without desks, without technology and sometimes without any textbooks! But the student cannot effectively and efficiently learn without a quality teacher. When those who "teach the teachers" and who "administer the teachers", stop focusing on other issues and start taking responsiblity for this sole issue, the quality of education in Texas and elsewhere will substantially improve!Â
And as a final note, I have no problem with the schools allowing the discussion of creationism and evolution. Learning is about understanding the strengths and weaknesses of theories- not about censoring what can be discussed!
Mr. Stern offers nothing new. It is the same old rant we've heard over and over. Our children aren't learning and basically "the teacher sucks."
The addition of more electics is only an attempt to keep kids in school so the graduation rates look better.
Mr. Stern quotes the following:
So, if we want to help our children become successful in education, business and life we must provide several basics:
Add history to that list. If students learn what it took to build this country, the likes of Obama, with his socialist agenda, would have never gotten elected.
More competition is what we need from our students. You don't think businesses compete? It's "dog eat dog" out there. " Everyone is the same" is more of the socialist agenda.Â
How do you suggest we lower the cost of education? Most of the education dollar is spent on special education or bi-lingual education - both a waste of time, teaching and money. What do you purpose to cut so these sacred cows can still exist?Â
You'lll never be able to fix it so keep griping. That's about all anyone can do.
Unfortunately, when we spend more money on "electives", we have less money to spend on what matters- math, science, english, history, and civics. While it's nice to provide "jewelry making classes" or "dance" to kids, perhaps we no longer have the luxury of spending our tax dollars on these classes! One of the debates now ongoing in our community is how many electives will be made available and what those electives will be. When students are required to take more electives, less time is available and/or required for the basics. While we want to provide some training for those who will probably not go on to college offering classes like welding or auto mechanics, the real issue is just what should a public high school education look like or include.  In the end, if we are to compete with other countries in this world, that public education must put the most dollars in math and science - not jewelry making and dance! Â
The thing is, despite all the talk about "accountability," the el-hi enterprise is out of control. Some kids will learn without instru ction. Others learn despite mis-instruction. Current testing practice credits these accomplishments too the schools and attributes the "failure of the remainder to the kids, parents, or ""society."Â
Methodology exists for gettiing "unstuck"Â but the "unaccountable" interests and individuals above the school site level are well-served by the status quo and the rhetorical fog that surrounds it..