Quick Search
All Blogs
Advertise Here?
Three Good Reasons to Become a Teacher: June, July & August
- Categorized in: Commentaries and Reports
Columnist EdNews.org
"Oh, to live on Sugar Mountain, With the barkers and the colored balloons . . ." – Neil Young
In the July 9, 2007 Issue of National Review is a short piece on "Workaholics". In it, the author makes the argument that Americans are preoccupied, actually obsessed, with work. He comes to this conclusion based on a number of factors. First, he points out that any increase in leisure activities over the past four decades is due to electronic appliances making our lives easier. Secondly, people living in Italy, France, Germany, the UK, Canada and Japan can take advantage of 10-28 more vacation days than the average 14 allotted to Americans. Most remarkable is that, on average, Americans, don't even take advantage of three of their vacation days.
Reading the aforementioned article, I couldn't help but feel that the author, Kevin Hassett, could have explored this subject much further. Although interesting in and of itself, this tidbit of information was just the jumping off place for something more central in understanding what a cross section of Americans are willing to do to maintain a particular standard of living, forge a career, or keep a roof over their heads. Something else he doesn't explore is the idea that there are people who do enjoy working, who find it feels a need in them to be doing something useful, perhaps for the betterment of society. But his most egregious omission is something that I, an education reformer, noticed straight away. What about teachers?
If I remember correctly, teachers are expected to put in around 188 days of teaching per school year. Let's do the math. If there are 52 weeks in a year x 5 days a week, that comes to 260 potential working days for the average Joe, minus ALL 14 vacation days, to arrive at an obligatory 246 days of work. Let's see. . ., 246 minus 188 equals 58 days more work expected of the average person than a teacher per calendar year. If a teacher works 20 years and retires, this adds up to 1160 days or a little more than 3 years worth of more leisure time available to them than the rest of the working population.
Let's look at this situation another way. For the average Joe, this year's Tax Freedom Day arrived on April 30th, the day after people stopped handing over the sum total of their paychecks to the government and instead, the total sum of their paychecks went to pay themselves. A portion of these tax dollars paid teachers in our public schools salaries that rival most salaries in the corporate world, except maybe VP and Sr. VP level employees who could be considered on par with the principals and superintendents of our public schools, and who make more money than teachers. In addition, these teachers are eligible for generous retirement benefits through TRS and provided top notch health plans –with low co-pays, prescription drug plans, and low deductibles. The average Joe is forced to contribute to Social Security, which may or may not pay out in the long run. For additional monies, some companies offer 401Ks. Neither of these options comes even close to providing the type of return that teachers are guaranteed without the anxiety of possibly losing money on their investment.
While a teacher, I worked hard and put in many extra hours on professional development, writing lesson plans, and grading papers. Now, employed in private industry, I find myself working even harder and putting in longer hours. . .this in addition to the 58 days more I'm expected on the job than my former colleagues. The difference is that if I or my present colleagues don't meet our benchmarks, because we don't have tenure, and because there is no guarantee that we will make enough money for the company to justify our salaries, we will most certainly find ourselves without a means to make a living. You can bet this reality keeps us on our toes. I wonder why our nation's schools are allowed to exist outside this reality, in a world where standards and benchmarks are vague enough to allow for broad interpretation, and whether effective or ineffective, teachers draw equal wages, for which the rest of the employed pay, not to mention their students.Published July 16, 2007
Editor's Choice
Sign up for our Free Daily Email Newsletter
> Haberman Foundation/National Louis University Masters Degree - Who will benefit when classroom teachers take this Action Research and Assessment masters degree?
> Healthcare Education Information
> Learn a foreign language
> Education & Teaching Degrees Online
> All You Need To Know About Visa to Learn French France
> Online College Degree - Information and tips on online degrees
> Haberman Foundation and Harvard Graduate School of Education complete a Collaborative Effort
> CampusExplorer.com Search for colleges
> NACAC.net National Association for Admissions Counseling
> Students.gov Link resources for students
And there's another thing Nancy doesn't mention. For those who stick it out, at the end of the 30 or 35-year career the teacher has a publicly funded pension waiting - a pension that never runs out no matter what, while the private sector employee has a fixed-size 401K or IRA that could be demolished in a single catastrophe. The typical teacher's pension, if annuitized (i.e. paid instantly), would be valued at somewhere between 0.5 and 2.5 million dollars. Private-sector people should spend some time thinking really hard about how different their prospects would be if there was a pension like this waiting for them at age 60.
That's quite a deal, I think. I have a daughter who is real clever and who has already figured this out. She determined very young that public sector employees make out WAY better than private sector employees, and she's going for the government jobs. Maybe some day she'll be supporting me.
There's an interesting treatment of this subject at http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-02-20-pen.... I think it will be both funny and tragic when the private sector boomers wake up in their old age to find themselves impoverished compared to their public-sector counterparts, who spent their careers enjoying their relatively (or in the case of teachers, extremely) long vacations while complaining constantly about their supposedly low pay.
In terms of benefits, I have been teaching for 6 years and am underwhelmed by the benefits. I pay more out of my paycheck for health care than I ever did in the private sector for about the same level of coverage. While I may be eligible for a pension (provided the govenor does not spend it before I retire) I would have been eligible for a pension with my company in the private sector as well. In addition, many companies offer a matching 401k program. My two previous companies matched my contribution dollar for dollar up to $1,000 per year. As 401K contributions are taken before taxes this is closer to $1200 per year. I can make 403k contributions as a teacher but I have never seen a school district offer any matching program.
Additionally, I would suggest that very few jobs are as mentally demanding as that of teaching--especially in an urban school district. There is little down time during the work day as I am educating 160 individuals each day. Furthermore, teachers are now expected to teach students proper behavior--things parents should be responsible for.
In terms of job performance, I saw two employees fired during my years in the private sector and this was for embezzelment, not due to job performance. I think most employers are reluctant to fire employees unless extreme conditions warrant it.
I agree that there are certain private sector jobs where your compensations is based on performance but I would wager that the number of people who are fired for not meeting performance benchmarks is small. I would surmise that the small number of people who lose jobs in this manner are in highly specialized positions. Underachieving employees may be passed over for promotion and they may not earn raises but rarely are they fired.
In terms of job pressure, how many times do you see a newspaper report on the sucess or lack therof for the the claims department of your local insurance company? Never. Yet, the result of statewide tests are reported within local papers regularly. The scores are usually broken down by subject area and school. In addition to the public scrutiny, teachers feel the heat from their bosses when scores fall ( see NCLB) below the acceptable level.
Every profession has employees who could improve-teaching is no exception. However, the teachers I have been associated with have been dedicated,caring teachers.
We all have a choice in our career. I am not trying to make the case that teachers are "underpaid". If we were underpaid the teaching schools would not be graduating thousands of new teachers each May. However, we are not "overpaid" either. We work hard and we are held accountable by our employers and the public.
All those days off? The students often have days off that the teachers don't. Those days are spent in planning meetings where curriculum and procedures are discussed and evaluated or preparation is done in the classroom. Teachers take their work home with them every day and on weekends; most other professionals do not...unless you want to talk about, let's say, lawyers, who make far more than $38,000/yr with their post-BA education. Teachers not only have to spend massive amounts of time planning lessons to meet the needs of all different learning abilities and making presentations and gathering materials, they have to spend the day with as many as 150 students or more (or teach 30 small kids all their various subjects), teaching those lessons as well as "babysitting", making sure they are all safe, keeping control and order. Then we get to take 150 papers home to grade, enter those grades, have parent-teacher conferences, spend our lunch time on the phone with parents, get involved in school committees and extra-curriculars, go to IEP meetings...
The summer off is not truly 3 months. Most schools let out sometime in June and start back in August, plus there are in-service days and beginning of the year prep days and professional development seminars etc etc. Many highly-qualified professionals receive fantastic vacation packages, 4 or 5 weeks a year, possibly more. Comparing a teacher's vacation time with the average for the whole country is comparing apples and oranges.
And of course, this is all if you even land a full-time position, which can be difficult, and comes after an entire certification process that includes an unpaid internship, criminal background checks, physical exams, state content area and basic skills exams (that are far from free) and the requirement of meeting more professional development benchmarks in order to keep your certification current.
So why do it? Because seeing children learn makes it all worth it. Because we believe that learning is exciting, and that education is one of the most important things in the world. How you can expect so much responsibility and so many credentials from one person and pay them less than $30-something thousand dollars a year is beyond me.
THere really do need to be some changes in teacher retirement and benefit plans commensurate with what the taxpayers get and certainly need to be more parity with social security, which no one can collect until they are 62.
We all make career choices for a reason--to be retailers, lawyers, researchers, teachers etc. based on salary packages, working conditions, and longevity in the field.
Always makes me laugh when private sector employees are the last to read such articles and the teachers are the first ones out in force to dispell any counter opinions to their line of work.lol