Quick Search
All Blogs
Advertise Here?
Too Good to Last: The True Story of Reading First
- Categorized in: Commentaries and Reports
Sol Stern
Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute
It is an in-depth and devastating expose of the scandalous efforts by the executive branch and Congress to sabotage the Reading First program. As is pointed out in the report, Reading First is a highly successful and effective program—the only one contained in the No Child Left Behind act that has received the stamp of approval from both the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Reading First is aimed at teaching poor, illiterate children basic primary-reading skills. It was also a once top administration priority (President Bush was promoting Reading First to students in a Florida classroom when 9/11 took place). But now Reading First’s budget has been slashed by two-thirds, the administration has gone AWOL and the program’s first director, Christopher Doherty, was forced to resign—all purportedly because of a "scandal" uncovered by the Education Department's Office of the Inspector General (OIG).
This report, however, reveals the real scandals that have yet to be brought to public attention:
Millions of poor, illiterate children are suffering because of the political games of adults who have undercut the implementation, budget and positive impact of the Reading First program.
Doherty was sacrificed for vigorously doing his job: making sure that only effective reading programs received funding—just as Congress envisioned and the White House intended—while denying requests for taxpayer dollars to flow to unreliable programs.
For doing his job, Doherty and his team were subjected to a reckless, one-sided, hydra-headed investigation by OIG head John Higgins. After failing to uncover any financial wrongdoing, corruption or abuse, the OIG published a weak, mostly unsubstantiated report that called Doherty’s integrity into question with little or no evidence.
Doherty was hung out to dry, even though he was doing the bidding of President Bush and then-domestic policy advisor Margaret Spellings (then LaMontagne). From her office in the West Wing, Spellings oversaw the Reading First program. She was Doherty’s de facto supervisor. Her invisible fingerprints were all over every key decision made by Doherty. Yet only Doherty came to grief.
President Bush and Secretary Spellings have allowed Reading First’s budget to be gutted, and a once top administration priority has fallen by the wayside.
Chairman David Obey (D-WI) of the House Committee on Appropriations slashed Reading First’s budget by over $600 million in fiscal 2008.
Chairman Obey is known to be friendly with Robert Slavin, developer of the Success for All reading program, who has publicly stated that he was angry Success for All was not receiving more federal funds under Reading First. He urged the OIG to investigate Doherty. Following the OIG report, Slavin demanded that Reading First’s budget be substantially cut—which Obey did.
Report- http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/reading_first_030508.pdf
In a Nutshell - http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/reading_first_nutshell_030508.pdf
At a Glance - http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/reading_first_glance_030508.pdf
Published March 5, 2008
Editor's Choice
Sign up for our Free Daily Email Newsletter
> Haberman Foundation/National Louis University Masters Degree - Who will benefit when classroom teachers take this Action Research and Assessment masters degree?
> Healthcare Education Information
> Learn a foreign language
> Education & Teaching Degrees Online
> All You Need To Know About Visa to Learn French France
> Online College Degree - Information and tips on online degrees
> Haberman Foundation and Harvard Graduate School of Education complete a Collaborative Effort
> CampusExplorer.com Search for colleges
> NACAC.net National Association for Admissions Counseling
> Students.gov Link resources for students
Colleen Gloster-Gray
Even Start Family educator
Despite the fact that nobody wants students to fail, it's not through paying million dollars to a failing program that we succeed. Too true, allowing Spellings to remain unaccountable for failed programs and blaming teachers for the program's failure are not the answers either. What would be a better way to spend taxpayer dollars? Give teachers opportunities to investigate recent educational research results, and allow them to do their jobs without the federal government micromanaging classrooms!