Too Good to Last: The True Story of Reading First

Sol Stern
Senior Fellow at the Manhattan Institute

It is an in-depth and devastating expose of the scandalous efforts by the executive branch and Congress to sabotage the Reading First program. As is pointed out in the report, Reading First is a highly successful and effective program—the only one contained in the No Child Left Behind act that has received the stamp of approval from both the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Reading First is aimed at teaching poor, illiterate children basic primary-reading skills. It was also a once top administration priority (President Bush was promoting Reading First to students in a Florida classroom when 9/11 took place). But now Reading First’s budget has been slashed by two-thirds, the administration has gone AWOL and the program’s first director, Christopher Doherty, was forced to resign—all purportedly because of a "scandal" uncovered by the Education Department's Office of the Inspector General (OIG). 

This report, however, reveals the real scandals that have yet to be brought to public attention:

 Millions of poor, illiterate children are suffering because of the political games of adults who have undercut the implementation, budget and positive impact of the Reading First program.

 Doherty was sacrificed for vigorously doing his job: making sure that only effective reading programs received funding—just as Congress envisioned and the White House intended—while denying requests for taxpayer dollars to flow to unreliable programs.

 For doing his job, Doherty and his team were subjected to a reckless, one-sided, hydra-headed investigation by OIG head John Higgins. After failing to uncover any financial wrongdoing, corruption or abuse, the OIG published a weak, mostly unsubstantiated report that called Doherty’s integrity into question with little or no evidence.

 Doherty was hung out to dry, even though he was doing the bidding of President Bush and then-domestic policy advisor Margaret Spellings (then LaMontagne). From her office in the West Wing, Spellings oversaw the Reading First program. She was Doherty’s de facto supervisor. Her invisible fingerprints were all over every key decision made by Doherty. Yet only Doherty came to grief.

 President Bush and Secretary Spellings have allowed Reading First’s budget to be gutted, and a once top administration priority has fallen by the wayside.

 Chairman David Obey (D-WI) of the House Committee on Appropriations slashed Reading First’s budget by over $600 million in fiscal 2008.

 Chairman Obey is known to be friendly with Robert Slavin, developer of the Success for All reading program, who has publicly stated that he was angry Success for All was not receiving more federal funds under Reading First. He urged the OIG to investigate Doherty. Following the OIG report, Slavin demanded that Reading First’s budget be substantially cut—which Obey did.

Report- http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/reading_first_030508.pdf

 

In a Nutshell - http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/reading_first_nutshell_030508.pdf

 

At a Glance - http://www.edexcellence.net/doc/reading_first_glance_030508.pdf

Published March 5, 2008


Comments (3)

Colleen Gloster-Gray
Said this on 9-3-08 At 05:55 pm
What would the GAO and OMB know about research based best practices in reading? I would much rather see a recommendation from the National Center for Family Literacy or the National Education Association than offices involved in governmental oversight whose employees serve at the pleasure of the current administration and have no training in relevant educational research! NCFL and NEA have a much broader and holistic views to educational practices which translate into sound reading approaches that address this multifaceted learning endeavor.

Colleen Gloster-Gray
Even Start Family educator
RF Teacher
Said this on 10-3-08 At 10:18 pm
Reading First is working in our poverty stricken district. How do we know? We measured students reading skills using standardized assessments. Also, and more importantly, our once struggling students now have a love for reading. I hope Congress considers this when they consider the President's new budget which seeks to restore much needed funds and resources for struggling districts such as our own.
Tommy
Said this on 20-3-08 At 12:18 am
Not so favorable reply to this story is found at http://www.greeleytribune.com/article/20080316/REA...

Despite the fact that nobody wants students to fail, it's not through paying million dollars to a failing program that we succeed. Too true, allowing Spellings to remain unaccountable for failed programs and blaming teachers for the program's failure are not the answers either. What would be a better way to spend taxpayer dollars? Give teachers opportunities to investigate recent educational research results, and allow them to do their jobs without the federal government micromanaging classrooms!
Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Approval Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message: